My claim is that SOM's model of working had something to do with the undifferentiated detail deployed in this project. The organizational chart adjacent talks about the different players present on the design project; in this case, Architect (A) Mechanical Engineer (Me) and Structural Engineer (Str) are all SOM. The closeness of these roles and their collapse into a single epistemic community (where engineers and architects are often typified as having differing linguistic norms and teleologies) makes it difficult for any to act unilaterally, instead merging into an assemblage which acts to territorialize a large part of the project, giving it an internal consistency created to mirror that of the formative organization not the many contextual cues contingent upon it. (De Landa, Assemblages Against Totalities, 13)
Oakland Arena organization structure |
Audi showroom design organization structure |
The directly architectural design solution given very similar constraints uses a series of spider joints hung from a series of tensile steel members (rather than compressive steel cantilevered from concrete). This solution allows the façade structure to highlight and be reducible to (rather than ignore and undermine) the overarching structural partí of the project. Applying this to the Oakland Arena would allow the steel façade elements to bunch around the monolithic concrete braces, creating nodes which accentuate the primary structure diagram then spread into a cloud meshwork in the center of each glazing span.
No comments:
Post a Comment